Media Violence Does Not Cause Teen Violence

Scott Barbour (1999 ) on his article Media forcefulness Does Not Cause immatureager Violence argued that blaming media ferocity as the cause of aggressive demeanour in today s teens is unfounded and perhaps a fiction . Barbour (1999 ) open(a) his arguments with the observation that most critics of media ferocity had darned abandon figure in movies , television shows games and rap songs as the witnesser of effect based on thousands of researches and studies on the relationship of media force and pillory expression . Barbour (1999 ) pointed emerge that among the supposed thousands of researches on the verbalize , only a few of which dealt with the direct relationship surrounded by exposure to media violence and onset or violent appearances . He also claimed that the results of the said studies only pointed out a colorless relationship at outflank and saying that media violence is the square up of teen violence is wrong . Barbour (1999 ) explained that the researches on media violence and attack were faulty because it did not return real number life situations in the case of laboratory experiments wherein experimental conditions may have air current to the aggressive behavior observed in chelaren after bilk a violent film Correlational studies were also sedulous to test the relationship of exposure to media violence and violent behavior , the results pointed out a weak association between the primeval variables , however this has been misconstrued by reports that assign causality to media violence when in fact correlations do not prove causality . belt ammunition lyrics have also been blamed for causing violence because it envisioned graphic and violent words however at that place is no definite study that supports this claim , he argued that rap songs depict the realit y of poverty , unemployment , and deplorable! conditions in this social groups .

Barbour (1999 ) pointed out that political science leaders had blamed media violence to account for the outgrowth in violent behaviors in today s society quite of providing interventions and correctly identifying the causes of violence former(a) than the media . He concluded that if the government wanted to prevent violence in teenagers , the government should digest more on the real and existing threats to the nation s teenagers . Barbour provided strong arguments and it is true that media violence simply does not cause teen violenceAccording to Barbour `laboratory studies are disputable because there is no way of greeting whether the response of the children in the studies was cause by viewing the violent film or a desire to the adult observers (p .1 . science lab experiments rarely depict real life situations and thus it cannot be reliably used as a basis for the closure that media violence then causes violent behavior . Moreover there is the concept of observer effect (Patton , 2003 ) which occurs when the subject s behavior is changed when they know that they are beingness observed . This is even manifested when as a young child I had to behave at my best when I knew that my relatives were tour and that my mother would be happy if I behaved well covering violent television...If you want to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.